A
Universe from Nothing: Why There is Something Rather than Nothing, by Lawrence
M. Krauss.
Financial Times, 10-11 March 2012
Why
is there something rather than nothing? “While this is usually framed as a
philosophical or religious question,” writes Lawrence Krauss in A Universe
from Nothing, “it is first and foremost a question about the natural world,
and so the appropriate place to try and resolve it, first and foremost, is with
science.”
A
leading physicist at Arizona State University, Krauss begins his entertaining
and engaging introduction to cosmology by pointing out that when scientists ask
“why?” they usually mean “how?” So for “Why is the Earth 93m miles from the
Sun?” read “How is the Earth 93m miles from the Sun?” What we need to
understand are the physical processes that led to the Earth ending up in its
present position.
“Nothing
expands the mind like the expanding universe,” says Richard Dawkins in an
afterword to this book. It was the American astronomer Edwin Hubble who, in the
1920s, discovered the first evidence that we lived in an expanding universe. As
Krauss makes clear, the weight of the accumulated observational data since
points to a Big Bang some 13.75bn years ago.
There
have been a number of fine cosmology books published recently, but few have
gone so far, and none so eloquently, in exploring why it is unnecessary to
invoke God to light the blue touchpaper and set the universe in motion.
An
instant after the Big Bang, the cosmos was smaller than an atom. It is here
that the best theory physicists have for understanding the science at this
atomic level comes into play: quantum mechanics. Often counter-intuitively,
this describes an atomic reality where “virtual” particles can pop in and out
of existence in a time so short they cannot be seen but only inferred from
circumstantial evidence.
 |
| Lawrence Krauss |
